Wednesday, June 8, 2011

Six Sigma vs. Total Quality Management

Six Sigma was developed with the intention of replacing the ACT.

E 'by some of the most talented CEOs to business success as much as possible - using the tools and techniques of professional quality.

What is the difference?

"Authority" - the difference between Six Sigma and TQM training can be described with one word. ACT provides general guidelines for management. TQM is often associatedThe development and provision and maintenance of the organization through various processes involved.

Six Sigma is the goal of continuously improving quality to achieve zero defects. ACT helps improve the quality, but we can not continue to improve. A significant difference is visible in the approach.

ACT is more on compliance with internal rules. Six Sigma focuses on continuous improvement and defect reduction. The project is led Six Sigmafor the benefit of the views of stakeholders, customers, shareholders and employees.

The result is the same for both systems, the achievement of better quality. Six Sigma is, however, is limited. It focuses on reducing defects and compliance with customer requirements. In addition, Six Sigma training can lower operating costs.

This is achieved by reducing cycle time, reduce errors and cost savings - but not at the expense ofquality and product value. The costs do not add value, customers are eliminated. Such expenses incurred by the waste.

TQM is usually taken an initiative at every level of operation, and can not be the same process. Six Sigma, meanwhile, aims to improve global operations in a single business process. For these projects, qualified and certified professionals such as Black Belts and Green Belts are required.

There are some team memberswho can work part-time in their daily activities of these projects. Its objective is to achieve the strategic objectives and plans for the alignment of corporate objectives. ACT projects are not necessarily all the specialists. These activities can be operated by non-aligned, with their usual workload.

Six Sigma team members to work temporarily in these projects. The objectives of the law are determined by the quality service and are based on the assumption that the baseThe criteria are good for the quality and organization. These projects are the quality philosophy motivated and carried out by quality professionals.

Six Sigma projects begin with a pre-draft charter and scheduled a review of objectives, highlighting the financial benefits and savings. Too often, organizations have implemented projects under the law, without any idea of ​​the economic benefits. The goal of ACT is in the standard of quality and performance, while Six Sigmastrategic objectives - and the measures are the goals and objectives.

Significant differences exist between TQM and Six Sigma - as well as some tools and techniques of TQM and Six Sigma are similar, Six Sigma often has a different use of these tools. It seems that Six Sigma is growing in popularity, reaching more than ACT.

No comments:

Post a Comment